What Are Golden Handcuffs? Definition and Explanation

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, it took a lot of work for companies to deal with numerous challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic created additional problems for companies. 

One of the biggest challenges is to retain employees. Companies use various methods in order to keep employees from leaving the company. 

Are you familiar with a term called “golden handcuffs?”

It is a term that refers to the financial allurements that companies use to retain their employees. What’s important, golden handcuffs come in various forms, but they all share one purpose: to bind employees to the organization by offering financial benefits that are hard to forsake. 

By understanding the concept of golden handcuffs and their impact on employee decisions, companies can better strategize their retention tactics, and employees can make more informed career choices. 

Golden handcuffs definition:

Golden handcuffs are financial incentives designed to motivate employees to stay with their current employer rather than seek employment elsewhere. These can be in the form of high salaries, stock options, bonuses, contractual stipulations, or other financial rewards and benefits. The term suggests that while these incentives are lucrative, they can also be restricting, binding the employee to the company.

Forms of golden handcuffs

Now, let’s focus on various forms of golden handcuffs. We can start with deferred compensation. 

Deferred compensation: Some companies offer bonus schemes where a portion of the bonus is deferred to be paid out at a later date, often after a certain number of years. The deferred amount often grows with time, giving employees a compelling reason to stick around.

Stock options: Employees are given the option to buy company stock at a predetermined price. The idea is that as the company grows and succeeds, the stock price will rise, and employees can make a profit by exercising their options. 

Restricted stock units (RSUs): As opposed to stock options, RSUs represent an ownership interest in the company. Nonetheless, RSUs come with a vesting schedule, requiring employees to stay with the company for a certain duration before they can access or sell these stocks.

Pension plans: Some pension plans are designed in a way that maximizes benefits if an employee stays with the company until retirement or a specific age.

Talent attraction: From the company’s perspective, offering golden handcuffs can be a way to attract top talent. High-potential candidates might be lured by the promise of significant long-term rewards, seeing it as a sign that the company values and is willing to invest in its employees.

Employee stock options 

Let’s get back to stock options. 

Employee stock options (ESOs) play a significant role in modern corporate compensation packages and serve several important purposes for both employees and employers. 

These options are contracts that give employees the right to purchase a specific number of company shares at a predetermined price within a set time frame. Here’s an in-depth explanation of the role and purpose of ESOs:

Aligning interests: ESOs are a powerful tool for aligning the interests of employees with those of shareholders and the company’s long-term success. When employees have a stake in the company’s performance, they are more likely to make decisions that benefit the organization, contributing to its growth and profitability. 

Retention and motivation: ESOs are often used as a retention and motivation tool. By offering employees the opportunity to become shareholders, companies can incentivize them to stay with the organization and work toward its success. 

ESOs can be structured with vesting periods, encouraging employees to remain with the company for a certain duration to fully realize the benefits.

Employee ownership: ESOs promote a sense of ownership and pride among employees. When they have a financial stake in the company, employees are more likely to feel a sense of ownership in their work, leading to increased dedication and commitment. This sense of ownership can result in improved job satisfaction and performance.

ESOs and tax benefits 

Risk-sharing: ESOs can be a valuable tool for risk-sharing. By allowing employees to purchase company shares at a fixed price, they have the potential to benefit from the company’s success without bearing the full financial risk of equity ownership. If the company’s stock price increases, employees can profit from the difference between the option price and the market price.

Retirement and wealth building: ESOs can serve as a means for employees to accumulate wealth and plan for retirement. As the value of the company grows, the stock options can become a valuable asset. Employees can exercise their options when they choose, potentially providing a significant financial cushion for the future.

Economic efficiency: Companies often use ESOs as a cost-effective form of compensation. Unlike cash bonuses or salary increases, ESOs do not immediately impact the company’s cash flow. Instead, they promise future compensation contingent on the company’s performance, which can be more affordable for businesses, especially startups with limited cash resources.

Tax benefits: ESOs may offer certain tax advantages for both employees and employers. Employees can often defer taxes until they exercise their options, potentially reducing their immediate tax liability. Employers may also be eligible for tax deductions related to the issuance of ESOs.

The impact of golden handcuffs on employees 

Golden handcuffs aren’t immune from challenges. It is important to analyze the impact of golden handcuffs on employees. 

Job mobility: Golden handcuffs can make it financially unattractive for an employee to consider job opportunities elsewhere, even if they are unsatisfied with their current role or believe they might have better career progression elsewhere. This is especially true if leaving means giving up substantial future earnings or benefits. 

Employee loyalty: While golden handcuffs can effectively retain employees, they might not foster genuine loyalty. Employees might stay because of the financial incentives, not because they believe in the company’s mission or feel a deep commitment. This could lead to reduced enthusiasm and motivation over time.

Risk aversion: Knowing that they stand to lose specific benefits or incentives, employees might become more risk-averse, avoiding actions or decisions that might jeopardize their position in the company. While this could mean reduced turnover for the company, it might also suppress innovative thinking and bold moves that could drive the company forward.

Personal financial planning: The allure of golden handcuffs often intertwines with an employee’s personal financial goals. 

Stress and burnout: While the financial incentives can be appealing, the pressure to stay in a job solely because of these incentives can lead to increased stress, especially if the employee feels trapped. Over time, this could result in burnout, decreased productivity, or even health issues.

Contractual bonuses or clauses: Contracts might stipulate that an employee has to pay back certain bonuses or undergo penalties if they leave before a certain time. 

Conclusion

Golden handcuffs serve as a double-edged sword. On the one hand, they can be effective retention tools, ensuring that talent remains within the company and contributes to its long-term success. On the other hand, if not structured thoughtfully, they can create an environment where employees stay out of obligation rather than passion or satisfaction.

For companies, it’s essential to strike a balance. While financial incentives are undeniably attractive, they should be paired with other retention strategies like career development opportunities, positive work culture, and meaningful work. This ensures that employees are not just staying for the money but because they genuinely want to.

For employees, the allure of golden handcuffs can be strong, especially when personal financial goals are on the line. However, it’s crucial to assess whether the financial benefits outweigh potential drawbacks like reduced job satisfaction, stress, or limited career mobility. It’s a decision that requires careful consideration of both present rewards and future aspirations.